- SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL UPGRADE
- SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL SOFTWARE
- SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL PLUS
- SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL PROFESSIONAL
- SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL MAC
A $1999 server version runs on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 or later and includes the full feature set, including the Dolby audio formats. I've received an offer from Eye Scream Factory for Sorenson Squeeze: ' For a limited time, MacVideo Promo is giving Avid editors the ability to upgrade from the bundled version of Squeeze to Squeeze Desktop 10 Pro for just 149.' Opposite to Sorenson upgrades / 399 bucks at theirs www / it is a very good price offer.
SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL PLUS
The Dolby Plus Pro Encoder is an additional $99. What it costs you: Squeeze Standard is $799, but video pros will want the $999 Squeeze Pro, which adds codec support for DNxHD and ProRes and includes the encoding manual. What’s Missing: Multi-video transcoding function is limited to one pre- and one post-video segment. I/O & built-in image enhancement technology Sorenson Squeeze for Macromedia Flash. What’s Cool: Broad HTML5 capabilities support for type 608 and 708 closed captions pre-roll and post-roll function enables assembly of multiple videos with common splash and end credits review and approve feature is much faster than previous version enhanced MXF color space plays well with popular NLEs like Adobe Premiere Pro. Pinnacle STUDIO Plus 700-USB with Studio Plus version 10 software. Target Applications: Video pros of every stripe will find Squeeze 9 indispensable for transcoding projects from a range of camera and other codecs like AVCHD, XDCAM, and ProRes to web- and mobile device-friendly formats like H.264 and MPEG-4. Summary: With broad HTML5 support, Squeeze 9 is a must-have tool for preparing video for the web.
SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL PROFESSIONAL
Tool is underpowered for high-end professional applications. HOT Simultaneous multifile encoding ease of use quality. PRICE: 599 (779 w/WMV Component for Mac) FROM: Sorenson Media, Inc. Presets are numerous, well organized, and clearly defined. Squeeze is definitely worth a serious look for anyone having to encode videos in a professional setting. Other comments: Excellent operational efficiency and integration with Adobe suite of applications. As in the case of Apple Compressor, engineers appear to have traded some degree of sharpness and contrast in order to suppress the most serious artifacts.Ĭomments (encode quality): overall less professional look than Squeeze or Episode lower contrast, muddier, softer, thus macroblocking and serious artifacting not as severe (see Fig 4d) Owing to its inclusion in the Adobe Creative Suite, AME sees wide use among a broad range of users. We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. government’s Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) fund. No HTML5 support.Ĭompared to Squeeze, Adobe Media Encoder produces a softer, more primitive look. Sorenson Video Relay Service (SVRS) is a service for the Deaf community paid for by the U.S. Analysis pass is time-consuming but may produce cleaner results.
Other comments: Pro version supports the industry’s top codecs and workflows. Other comments: Outstanding user interface and ease of use, MLTU (Most Likely To Use) factor = HIGH robust HTML5 support H.264 implementation is best in classĮpisode applies more extensive analysis than Squeeze, helping to minimize serious artifacts at the price of much longer processing times.Ĭomments (encode quality): Higher contrast overall with deeper blacks than Squeeze look is not as organic but with good sharpness fewer contours and less banding apparent in torture test. One downside of this preferred strategy is the increased risk of banding, macroblocking, and contour artifacts.Ĭomments (encode quality): Very sharp, good contrast some notable contours/banding and macroblockage in ‘torture test’ Little, if any, dither or softness is applied in Squeeze 9 in order to suppress objectionable artifacts. I am sure there are also sophisticated ffmpeg softwares for Windows.įfmpeg has matured over time and I wouldn't hesitate to use it even for professional purposes (I do use iffmpeg to transcode my AVCHD MTS files to DNxHD 10bit or to ProsRes HQ 10bit before editing).Īnother option is x264 codec in conjunction with MPEG Streamclip (freeware).The torture test.
SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL MAC
It fully supports Multi Core utilization on Mac and therefore it's pretty fast. I would also recommend iffmpeg (which is of course based on ffmpeg and uses x264). Personally I do use Sorensen Squeeze for H264 transcoding since the MainConcept H264 Codec & Squeeze preserve consistent colors and tonal values (same here: it's bundled with Avid MC, so I didn't have to pay for it).
SORENSON SQUEEZE 10 TUTORIAL SOFTWARE
I've once seen it in action with a colleague and it is indeed very fast (compared to pure software transcoding) and the quality is really, really good. For H264 there is also this affordable USB-based Hardware solution:
0 kommentar(er)
